So now that I’ve seen all five of the Academy Award nominees for Best Picture, I thought I’d throw my two cents (Canadian) out there about what I think:
In any other year, this is probably the film that would be a lock for Best Picture. It’s the kind of sweeping, romantic period piece that the Academy loves. And it would deserve it! This is a great adaption of some difficult material to translate to the screen. Particularly good is Saoirse Ronan, as the young girl who sees some things she does not understand, and spends the rest of her life seeking atonement for the lives ruined by her response.
Be forewarned you’ll need to be paying attention though, as the film jumps around in time quite a bit, even showing the same scenes from different perspectives. Definitely worth paying attention though.
This was a real treat. Nothing epic here, but it was clever, funny, moving, and downright charming. I don’t see it winning Best Picture, but a win by Ellen Page for Best Actress would not surprise me at all. It’s nice to see a film that shows adoption as viable and positive option, although I would imagine that it would be a mistake to think that this is meant as any sort of “message” and is just a plot necessity.
I’d highly recommend this to anyone.
I was kind of surprised to see Michael Clayton nominated (personally, I would have given this spot to the wonderful Ratatouille), but it was still an excellent film that’s worthy of being recognized. George Clooney is excellent as the titular Clayton, but for me the real stars were Tilda Swinton as the chief counsel for a huge, corrupt corporation that Clayton’s firm represents, and Tom Wilkenson as a lead attorney suffering a mental breakdown.
I think that this one will be especially enjoyed by people who like legal thrillers, but there’s a lot more to it than that.
This one is interesting, because I think it’s showing itself a film that a lot of people will feel is either the most brilliant thing they’ve seen in years, or a waste of two hours. I fall much closer to the former, but I understand the latter, as the now-infamous ending leaves more than just film luddites with a lack of closure and a heap of questions. Still, it’s a gorgeous piece of film-making, and Javier Bardem is justifiably praised for his performance as the cold and merciless Anton Chigurh.
If you’re a fan of the Coen Brothers, this is one of their best yet. Just be prepared that this is a film that requires something of its audience, and that the fullness of the themes may take some digesting before they settle in. Definitely worth checking out though.
This is my pick for Best Picture, and I believe it will win, as will Daniel Day-Lewis for his scenery-chewing role as Daniel Plainview, a successful oilman who cannot abide competition and has a tentative grasp on the slightest affection for mankind (it occurs to me that Plainview is in many ways similar on the surface to Day-Lewis’ portrayal of Bill the Butcher in Martin Scorsese’s Gangs of New York, however here he hates everyone, not just the Irish!). Watching Plainview’s rise to great power and success, even as he descends into madness, is gripping.
This is rightly being called an American masterpiece, and I’d recommend seeing it in the theater while you can.
—
So, those are my thoughts. What are yours?
I suppose I must have left a good impression though, because at the end of the day when everyone was putting on their coats to leave, Grandma Lois failed at her attempt at a whisper and said loud enough for us all to hear “I think Anna should marry that man!”.